I also call the attention of my colleagues to a statement from the Civil Liberties and Privacy Office of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. In that statement, the Civil Liberties and Privacy Office says: Concerns have been raised that the PAA could result in the interception of U.S. person communications. As explained in the Department of Justice September 14 letter, and in a letter by the DNI's Civil Liberties Protection Officer dated September 17, 2007, U.S. persons' privacy interests are protected through ``minimization procedures,'' which must meet FISA's statutory definition. In addition, ``reverse targeting'' is implicitly prohibited under existing law. As a side note, Mr. President, this measure explicitly prohibits reverse targeting, but the Privacy Office goes on to say: The SSCI bill in addition requires review of minimization procedures and explicitly prohibits reverse targeting.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about privacy and reverse targeting in relation to an amendment.
Share
More from Julian Bond
We ought to be happy that other people, including gays and lesbians, and many other people have imitated the black movement for human rights.
Well, it's one of the most cynical things I've ever heard of or ever seen spelled out in this way. The idea that these people are just pawns that can be played with, the black people who oppose gay marriage, and the black people who…
I thank the leaders of this effort, my good friends, Senators Dodd and Shelby, for their hard work and their efforts to address the housing crisis and the need to reform regulatory oversight of the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie…
I don't think so. I think this -- and African-American communities like every other community in the country, the tide is shifting.





