Well, Mr. President, I might say to the distinguished minority leader, this is one of the problems we get when there is a legislative matter on which there have been no hearings in the Senate. We are attempting to determine the basis of that assumption here on the floor of the Senate. This should properly be done in a Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing. As I understand what the minority leader says in his arguments--and none of us have any question about the pain and difficulty that a family with a child born with spina bifida goes through. What we are asking is whether there is a reasonable basis in fact. Now, as I understand it, all of these assumptions are based on something called the ranch-hand study, is that correct?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for hearings on legislative matters related to veterans' affairs.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I don't think so. I think this -- in African-American communities, like every other community in the country, the tide is shifting, people are thinking differently.
When the president says he's for something, it doesn't mean it is going to happen. It just means we now know what he feels and how he thinks about it.
I dispute his statement that there were 6 years of unlawful activity of the President. He said no court will be able to review the illegality; no independent officials have reviewed it. First, it is my understanding, although I was not one…
Well, I think it is. I mean any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.





