I just appreciate the effort the Senator from Arkansas is making to ensure that the spending on this widely supported and strongly endorsed program is kept under control, but the space station is already operating under administrative caps. I understand the authorizing committee is examining the potential for legislated caps. I think this is an issue appropriately to be referred to the authorizers. It deserves careful consideration, not brought forward here in the last moment on an appropriations bill debate. I just say, Mr. President, space station is a research and development project. It has a lot of uncertainties but tremendous promise. It is rocket science. We are dealing with rocket science. We should not lock NASA in stone with caps that are pulled out of thin air here at the last minute in the appropriations process. I urge my colleagues to join me in opposing the Bumpers amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding and oversight of the space station during appropriations bill debate.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I rise to speak about TARP. The President has submitted the request for the second half of the funds. This is not an easy decision for Members of Congress. We have lots of questions about how the first $350 billion was spent. Questions…
to begin, I think I should make some general comments about my concern and about my ability to work with the distinguished chairman of the committee on affordable housing programs. We have worked a long time on these programs together, and…
I don't think so. I think this -- in African-American communities, like every other community in the country, the tide is shifting, people are thinking differently.
Today I wish to talk about a number of concerns I have about the underlying bill as well as some amendments I have filed and propose to call up. I think it is important to put this in context. Our Nation is in the midst of a serious…





