as I indicated, the dangers to the providers would be as great under substitution as if they were sued directly. While the providers might not be parties to the litigation, under the amendment offered by Senators Specter and Whitehouse, discovery would be allowed to proceed against the providers, and this puts them at the same risk of disclosure as allowing the litigation to proceed directly against them. That is one of the most sensitive intelligence programs in our history. The intelligence community has done a thorough bipartisan review of the providers' conduct, and we in the committee feel we cannot risk our intelligence sources and methods by allowing litigation to continue and by allowing the potential of significant damage to those companies and their shareholders who may be widows and orphans and certainly members whose pensions may be invested in shares of those companies.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the risks to intelligence providers in relation to proposed amendments during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I thank the leaders of this effort, my good friends, Senators Dodd and Shelby, for their hard work and their efforts to address the housing crisis and the need to reform regulatory oversight of the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie…
to begin, I think I should make some general comments about my concern and about my ability to work with the distinguished chairman of the committee on affordable housing programs. We have worked a long time on these programs together, and…
Full equality means enjoying all of the rights that everybody else in the country enjoys. If everybody else in the country enjoys rights one, two, three and four, you have got to enjoy those rights too.
I rise to introduce the Limitations on Interrogation Techniques Act of 2009. This bill is identical to one I introduced last summer, along with Senators Hatch, Chambliss, Burr, and Warner. Last week, my colleague and good friend on the…





