I am relieved to see I was not the only one confused by the formula. I tried to figure out how the formula in section 2 would work, and I found a lot more questions than answers. The EPA has advised us that they don't know how the formula would work. That is why I said a few moments ago that on these complicated items there needs to be substantive hearings. There should be hearings on how the changes might affect existing water bonding issues, existing water programs in the States. There should be hearings on how these changes would affect the States where the needs are. Most important, we need to sit down with all of the players and make sure we have a formula that everybody understands and that works. So I believe the EPA has given us the reasons that we described in general about the problems in trying to adopt a significant change on the floor.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the EPA's formula and the need for hearings on water program changes.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I thank the leaders of this effort, my good friends, Senators Dodd and Shelby, for their hard work and their efforts to address the housing crisis and the need to reform regulatory oversight of the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie…
All Americans ought to enjoy civil rights, and whatever the court does today, we are going to move a step closer to everyone enjoying these rights.
The next amendment I offer, No. 4987, was designed to protect potential home buyers with additional mortgage loan disclosure requirements. I explained and discussed this amendment with the two leaders of the Banking Committee when we had…
our families are struggling in the worst economy since the Great Depression. It is a difficult time for many who do not have jobs or who have seen their savings shrink or are in danger of losing their homes. We are working very hard on…





