Section 304 of this legislation includes 'recreation and fish and wildlife mitigation' as purposes of the White River Basin Lakes project approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218.). There are some in my State who have voiced strong concern that this provision may impact adversely the currently authorized project purposes of flood control, power generation, and other purposes. They fear that the outcome may be loss in generation capacity or energy production which would increase the costs to ratepayers and adversely affect the region's citizens. The Senate language, however, explicitly authorizes these new purposes 'to the extent that the purposes do not adversely impact flood control, power generation, or other authorized purposes of the project.' Is it the intent of the Senators from Arkansas, who sponsored this provision, that this provision forbids any adverse impacts on currently authorized projects?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the impact of new provisions on existing project purposes in the White River Basin Lakes project.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I thank the leaders of this effort, my good friends, Senators Dodd and Shelby, for their hard work and their efforts to address the housing crisis and the need to reform regulatory oversight of the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie…
Full equality, it means enjoying all of the rights that everybody else in the country enjoys.
It's the most -- one of the most cynical things I've ever heard of or seen spelled out in this way.
I dispute his statement that there were 6 years of unlawful activity of the President. He said no court will be able to review the illegality; no independent officials have reviewed it. First, it is my understanding, although I was not one…





