I will ask the question of the Senator from Utah, who happens to be in the line of sight of the Chair, both of whom I respect. I will focus the question to the Senator from Utah. Do you share the concern that should a clerk, assistant counsel to a U.S. Senator, or perhaps a Member of the other body, be nominated for a judicial position, under this principle enunciated by our friends on the other side of the aisle the nominee would have to turn over all of the papers prepared for that Senator, or that House Member, or the committee for which that nominee may have worked?
Julian Bond: “I will ask the question of the Senator from Utah, who happens to be in the line of sight of the Chair, both of whom I…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a principle regarding judicial nominations during Senate debate.
Share
More from Julian Bond
When the president says he's for something, it doesn't mean it is going to happen. It just means we now know what he feels and how he thinks about it.
Full equality means enjoying all of the rights that everybody else in the country enjoys. If everybody else in the country enjoys rights one, two, three and four, you have got to enjoy those rights too.
Well, I think it is. I mean any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.
I don't think so. I think this -- and African-American communities like every other community in the country, the tide is shifting.





