I will ask the question of the Senator from Utah, who happens to be in the line of sight of the Chair, both of whom I respect. I will focus the question to the Senator from Utah. Do you share the concern that should a clerk, assistant counsel to a U.S. Senator, or perhaps a Member of the other body, be nominated for a judicial position, under this principle enunciated by our friends on the other side of the aisle the nominee would have to turn over all of the papers prepared for that Senator, or that House Member, or the committee for which that nominee may have worked?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a principle regarding judicial nominations during Senate debate.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I thank the Chair. My decision to support Mr. Holder's nomination does not come easily. Certainly, Mr. Holder has an outstanding reputation as a career prosecutor and an effective litigator, and he has received strong support from…
Any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.
Some people are a little confused. In 30 seconds--50 seconds maybe--let me tell you, this is $2 billion in direct equity that goes to State housing finance programs to produce affordable housing. The funds come from the home moneys in the…
The bill we passed in the Senate with an overwhelming bipartisan majority protected civil liberties of American citizens much further than they have ever been protected even under existing criminal law, we provided more protection. The…





