I have heard it said that the Secretary defended the rules of engagement for the Abu Ghraib prison, with possibly a misunderstanding that he approved or somehow condoned what went on and what has been revealed in the shocking photos of abuse we have seen. Let's be clear on one thing. The rules of engagement are very clear, and the rules of engagement do not permit or tolerate the kind of abuses we have seen depicted in the Abu Ghraib prison. This is a real difference between a free, democratic country with respect for human rights observing the Geneva Convention, and those who do not. It has been stated on the Senate floor that we are no better than the Saddam Hussein government that was running the prisons. That is an unnecessary slanderous attack on the men and women of the military who do believe, by and large--99.999 percent--in the standards we set. The difference in our country is that when we see these evidences of abuse we move to do something about them. Investigations began in January. The first criminal indictments were handed down near the end of March.
On the recordMay 13, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the controversy surrounding the Abu Ghraib prison abuse and the rules of engagement.
Share
More from Julian Bond
May 9, 2012
Well, I think it is. I mean any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.
Jan 16, 2009
our families are struggling in the worst economy since the Great Depression. It is a difficult time for many who do not have jobs or who have seen their savings shrink or are in danger of losing their homes. We are working very hard on…
Jun 26, 2008
I thank our leaders for getting us on this very important bill. As we have discussed before, the failure to modernize and authorize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act last summer has caused serious gaps in our intelligence…





