On the recordJuly 29, 1999
It would hurt U.S. jobs, because when we have the inability to transfer our technology, to transfer our American interest to foreign countries, those jobs are going to go to other countries.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Concerns about job losses due to the amendment.
Share
More from Jo Bonner
Feb 5, 2013
Last week unemployment rose to 7.9 percent, and consumer confidence in the economy fell to a 14-month low. During the last 3 months of 2012, the economy shrank for the first time since the depths of the Great Recession. All of these…
May 27, 2010
When EADS wins the competition this time, as they did the previous time, they intend to create almost 48,000 jobs in the United States, many of which, quite honestly, will be in my district in Alabama. But they will be in all 50 States. So…
Jul 29, 1999
The sponsor of the amendment indicated that OPIC costs us money. In reality, Mr. Chairman, let me tell my colleagues that OPIC makes money.
Aug 2, 2012
As chairman of the Committee on Ethics, I rise in support of a resolution before us today which calls for a reprimand for Representative Laura Richardson of California. Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the responsibility for…
Other voices in this conversation
