I rise to add my voice in opposition to the amendment offered by my friend from Ohio. I believe this approach taken by this amendment is misguided. The Appropriations Committee has put before the House a CR that makes significant cuts to all areas of our Federal Government, but these cuts have been made with deliberate intent and after careful consideration. In other words, they have been done surgically, and I believe this amendment would take a more indiscriminate hatchet approach. The Republican Pledge to America states, "we will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone"; but it doesn't say we have to accomplish this task in the first spending bill before us, and it did not envision accomplishing it in the remaining 7 months. I hope we can defeat this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Bonner opposes an amendment related to federal spending cuts.
Share
More from Jo Bonner
I thank the chairman for yielding me time. Back home, the American people listen to Members of Congress talk about things that are historic, about things that are important. Today, we're talking about something that's very important…
The WTO has only had an interim ruling, and everyone knows that. And within weeks, the WTO should be able to consider the complaint of the European Union against Boeing. To that point, $16.6 billion in R&D subsidies have been recorded for…
I thank the gentleman, and I join in the comments that have already been made in expressing our deep gratitude to a young man who, by many standards, is still a young man and who obviously has a very bright future in front of him, but who…





