I rise to add my voice in opposition to the amendment offered by my friend from Ohio. I believe this approach taken by this amendment is misguided. The Appropriations Committee has put before the House a CR that makes significant cuts to all areas of our Federal Government, but these cuts have been made with deliberate intent and after careful consideration. In other words, they have been done surgically, and I believe this amendment would take a more indiscriminate hatchet approach. The Republican Pledge to America states, "we will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone"; but it doesn't say we have to accomplish this task in the first spending bill before us, and it did not envision accomplishing it in the remaining 7 months. I hope we can defeat this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Bonner opposes an amendment related to federal spending cuts.
Share
More from Jo Bonner
This is a sad day, but a necessary day, to complete final action on a matter that honestly should have been concluded with a public trial. Mr. Rangel chose to walk out of that hearing and failed to present his case. Instead, we are left…
I thank the gentleman for yielding. I'm pleased to join my colleagues today in support of this amendment. Let's be clear: Today's amendment, even if adopted, is not the end of our efforts to make the gulf coast whole after the tragic BP…
Earlier this week the President sent his fiscal year 2013 budget request to Congress. It's been roundly panned as being ``not serious,'' ``inadequate,'' and ``political.'' But, Mr. Speaker, I want the American people to understand, in…
Amendment XXI: Section 1: ``The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.'' Section 2: ``The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for…





