I would like to oppose the Harkin amendment. It is my judgment that the rules have been effective over the years and I do not feel that we ought to change the rules pertaining to cloture and the right of extended debate. We sometimes have different alignments pertaining to membership relative to our parties and therefore Senate rules affect us. The rule regarding the right to extended debate can be a two-edge sword at times, and I do not believe it should be changed. But, in my judgment, the Senate is a deliberative body and the Senate ought not just be a smaller House of Representatives. I think that the present rules are operating effectively. I add my voice to those that are advocating that we continue with the present rule that we have.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Harkin amendment regarding Senate rules on cloture and extended debate.
Share
More from Howell Heflin
it would be my understanding that with regard to the authority given the administrator to require a period of not less than 60 days for public comment after issuing a regulation under section 408(e)(1) of the Act that this would apply only…
when I learned that Senator David Pryor was not planning on seeking reelection this year, I realized that few Members of this body have meant so much to the Nation while at the same time serving the people of their State. Back in 1951, at…
Tomorrow, Mr. President, on October 1 of this year, the Post Office will celebrate the 100th anniversary of Rural Free Delivery [RFD]. RFD now serves the whole country, some 25.5 million households and businesses in all, and it is a…
As I understand it, this has been shown to the Department of Agriculture, and they have reservations pertaining to this. They are in the process right now of probably becoming involved in a lawsuit. Therefore, they object to it, and…





