All right. Now, I am not sure that I understand this provision, the last one, which is No. 8. It reads: In section 102(c), add the following new paragraph: (8) create a cause of action or provide for jurisdiction by a Federal Court under section 1331 or 1337 of title 28, United States Code, that otherwise would not exist under applicable Federal or State law. Now, that provision in there, I believe, is in the bill that was introduced. That is to prevent saying: ``Create a Federal cause of action,'' and therefore leaves it strictly to the preemption that is in this bill as amended and does not create a separate cause of action at the Federal courts; is that correct?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning a provision in a bill regarding federal jurisdiction and causes of action.
Share
More from Howell Heflin
2 years ago, we in the Senate--and the Nation--were saddened to hear that our colleague Paul Simon would not seek reelection this year. As a national figure who truly embodies integrity, respectability, and character, Senator Simon will…
several of us in the U.S. Senate, as well as some in the House of Representatives, have had the pleasure over the years of knowing and working with the Right Honorable Michael Jopling, a British Member of Parliament and former Minister of…
let me say that one aspect of his argument was agreed to in the recently passed farm bill, when he talks about these people who had quotas and lived in Boston and farmed in Alabama. There was a provision in the farm bill where production…
I rise today to extend my birthday wishes to Mrs. Mary Singletary Taylor, a native of Henry County, AL. She was born 98 years ago today--September 18, 1898. I understand that with the exception of some hearing loss, Mrs. Taylor is in good…





