On the recordSeptember 13, 2017
In spite of numerous requests--with all due respect to the gentlewoman from Colorado and the distinguished Delegate from the District of Columbia--in spite of numerous requests, no exemptions were included in the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act for either moral or religious objections. I think my colleague from Colorado just pointed that out, that they intended no exceptions. RHNDA, as enacted, has no religious exemption, and legislative history suggests it may have been passed specifically to target faith- based employers. Nobody should be forced to take a position one way or the other, or be able to hire them. By leaving this in place, it exposes employers to potential lawsuits. I would like to point out that, in regard to Congress' authority over this issue, Article I, section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have power to exercise exclusive legislation, in all cases whatsoever, over the District. Mr. Chair, I take exception to my colleague's point that it is acceptable to infringe on the religious liberties of certain people who actually believe in protecting life. The Constitution does not provide for only a certain group to practice their religion, but everyone has a right to practice his or her religion. No government interest can overcome that constitutional right. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.





