the question is: Do we support President Trump with this authority? Absolutely, we do. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 7084, the Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2026. This legislation makes it clear: The United States will not stand for unlawful harassment campaigns against American companies and American workers. For over 35 years, Vulcan Materials Company, based in Alabama, has lawfully owned and operated a limestone quarry in Mexico. Yet, since 2018, the Mexican Government has unlawfully restricted Vulcan's operations and wrongfully targeted them through coercion and intimidation. In 2022, the Mexican President attempted to seize the property. When Vulcan refused to surrender, Mexico retaliated by issuing shutdown orders. No American company should be pressured into accepting a fire-sale takeover or punished for standing up for its lawful rights. Vulcan followed the law, held up its end of the deal, and operated transparently. What they received in return was their property stolen and seized by the Mexican Government. These actions have essentially left the only deepwater port on the Yucatan Peninsula--owned, constructed, and operated for years by Vulcan--and the surrounding land open for sale to our adversaries. This is unbelievable. The Defending American Property Abroad Act gives the United States the tools to push back against foreign countries and trading partners when our companies are unlawfully targeted and harassed.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for the Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2026 and the case of Vulcan Materials Company.
Share
More from Dale Strong
I stand with our great ally as they fight to eliminate the dire threat to their survival posed by the Iranian-backed terrorists.
As illegal aliens continue to pour across the Southern Border, your fiscal year 2025 budget request funding for just 34,000 ICE beds, barely half of the 60,000 beds requested by the Trump administration in fiscal year 2021.
Under the previous administration, President Trump, it is a fact our borders were much more secure.
I also rise in opposition to the amendment. Chair Rogers is exactly right. I want to emphasize one of the points that he made. The language in the bill that this amendment is proposing to strike is effectively the same language Congress…





