let me begin by joining the various Members of this institution who will speak today and who will urge the passage of both of these bills. I certainly cannot speak with the particular passion of the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Matsui) who has been touched by this issue, but this is a very good day for the House of Representatives. It is a very good day, because we have managed to reach across the partisan divides, I believe twice today, or we will manage to reach across the partisan divide, I believe twice today, to pass bills that are good for the American people and good for countless numbers of Americans who need this research. I want to say something about the cord blood bill in particular. I have had the honor for 2 years of working with the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith) on this bill, and I am a Democratic sponsor on it; and I want to thank him for his good work. This bill will make an enormous difference to the African Americans around this country who often struggle with blood matches. Cord bloods do not require a blood match. The young man that we saw on the Cannon terrace yesterday who suffered from sickle cell anemia whose life has been permanently transformed by cord blood cell technology speaks to the power of this bill. We talk a great deal about health care disparities, and we ought to talk about health care disparities in this country; but rather than talk, this bill acts.…
Share
More from Artur Davis
I was in rural Alabama, in my home district, about close to exactly a year ago now. It was mid-June of 2003. And I had the honor of being the commencement Speaker at Judson College in Perry County, Alabama. I remember a woman walked up to…
Prior to the conception of the HOPE VI program, we tended to believe that public housing was a condition that was not alterable, it was not changeable; and, similarly, we believed that it would look pretty much as it did when a public…
a minute is not a long time, but I want to spend it for thanking the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Spratt) for building unanimity on this side of the House. I make that observation because, frankly, this is only the second time on a…
If that is the Chair's ruling, I would ask, without prejudice, permission to address it now, based on the absence of other people being on the floor. I would ask unanimous consent to address it now. The CHAIRMAN. The Chair would ask, is…





