I am normally one who tends to be resistant to too many political analyses that rest on generation. I am one of these people who thinks that people try to load a whole lot of analytical content into that term when it should not always be there, but this is something that occurs to me from listening to all three of you. Maybe because we are new to this body, maybe because all four of us are relatively new to public life, maybe because all four of us are still young people, we still have a sense of the possible. We still have a sense of how the power in this institution and the power in this government can still be used to make better the lives of some of our people. Sometimes when I listen to our friends and our colleagues on the other side of the aisle, I honestly think one of the most fundamental differences is that they do not have a very strong sense of the possible.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of optimism and potential in politics during a congressional dialogue.
Share
More from Artur Davis
let me address the contingency fee provision that has come up several times. Mr. McCrery, I agree with you that contingency fee lawyers are a very, very narrow class of people. They are the only major business in America that gets paid…
I thank you for letting me claim the time for my colleague, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Conyers), who I trust will join us tonight. Mr. Speaker, several of my colleagues have gathered to honor an individual who was one of the…
We are saving $14 billion in United States taxpayer dollars. That is an important change in values in this institution because the last Congress, when they wanted to save money, here is how they did it. They decided we will save $8 billion…
the response I would make to that is that it is my understanding that because the funding has been zeroed out for HOPE VI, we are entitled to raise the amendment and that we can, in effect, either reach forward or reach backward as far as…





