No doubt the deductions may be right; in most writers they are so; but where did the premises come from?
Walter Bagehot: “No doubt the deductions may be right; in most writers they are so; but where did the premises come from?”
Editor's note · Context
Bagehot questions the origins of premises in philosophical deductions, highlighting a potential flaw.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
The casual line was traced according to the strength of deceased combatants; succeeding generations fought elsewhere; and the hesitating line of a half-drawn battle was left to stand for a perpetual limit.
Subject to this saving remark, however, I not only admit, but maintain, that our Constitution is full of curious oddities, which are impeding and mischievous, and ought to be struck out.
But it is natural also that persons used to analyse political institutions should look at these anomalies with a little tenderness and a little interest.
Our law very often reminds one of those outskirts of cities where you cannot for a long time tell how the streets come to wind about in so capricious and serpent-like a manner.





