On the record
The conscious end of early societies was not at all, or scarcely at all, the protection of life and property, as it was assumed to be by the eighteenth-century theory of government.
Said by
Walter Bagehot
Source
gutenberg.orgWalter Bagehot: “The conscious end of early societies was not at all, or scarcely at all, the protection of life and property, as it was…”
Editor's note · Context
Bagehot challenges the notion that early societies primarily aimed to protect life and property, as suggested by 18th-century theories.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
He had seen that LEISURE is the great need of early societies, and slaves only can give men leisure.
The Parliament, the laws, the press were human institutions; but the Monarchy was a Divine institution.
Carlyle has taught the present generation many lessons, and one of these is that 'God-fearing' armies are the best armies.
There is no ELASTIC element, everything is rigid, specified, dated.
Other voices in this conversation
