Its constitution, if left to itself, is not monarchical, but aristocratical.
Walter Bagehot: “Its constitution, if left to itself, is not monarchical, but aristocratical.”
Editor's note · Context
Bagehot asserts that society's constitution is more aristocratic than monarchical when left to its own devices.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
I cannot, therefore, join in the full cry against anomalies; in my judgment it may quickly overrun the scent, and so miss what we should be glad to find.
But it is natural also that persons used to analyse political institutions should look at these anomalies with a little tenderness and a little interest.
Subject to this saving remark, however, I not only admit, but maintain, that our Constitution is full of curious oddities, which are impeding and mischievous, and ought to be struck out.
At last it strikes you that they grew up, house by house, on the devious tracks of the old green lanes; and if you follow on to the existing fields, you may often find the change half complete.





