On the record
I propose to begin this paper by asking, not why the House of Commons governs well? but the fundamental--almost unasked question--how the House of Commons comes to be able to govern at all?
Said by
Walter Bagehot
Source
gutenberg.orgI propose to begin this paper by asking, not why the House of Commons governs well? but the fundamental--almost unasked question--how the House of Commons comes to be able to govern at all?
Bagehot emphasizes the importance of understanding the foundational aspects of governance by the House of Commons.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
If the above reasoning be sound, compulsory constituencies are necessary, voluntary constituencies destructive; the optional transferability of votes is not a salutary aid, but a ruinous innovation.
No doubt this momentary gain is bought at a ruinous after-cost.
They are above corruption because they are the corruptors.
The United States could not have become monarchical, even if the Constitutional Convention had decreed it, even if the component States had ratified it.