The English character was much the same in many great respects in Chaucer's time as it was in Elizabeth's time or Anne's time, or as it is now; But some qualities were added to this common element in one era and some in another; some qualities seemed to overshadow and eclipse it in one era, and others in another.
Walter Bagehot: “The English character was much the same in many great respects in Chaucer's time as it was in Elizabeth's time or Anne's…”
On the record
Said by
Walter Bagehot
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Bagehot observes the continuity and change in the English character across different historical periods.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
He gave an excellent moral example to his contemporaries, but he is an instance of those whose good dies with them, while their evil lives after them.
If the above reasoning be sound, compulsory constituencies are necessary, voluntary constituencies destructive; the optional transferability of votes is not a salutary aid, but a ruinous innovation.
Now it is not conceivable that a race of beings with valuable instincts supporting their existence and supplying their wants would need these simple tools.
The power of free interchange of ideas being wanting, the ideas themselves were barren.





