Far different would be the effect of the decision of an international Court, in which, though it might run directly counter to British theory and practice, Great Britain would have bound herself beforehand to acquiesce.
Thomas Erskine Holland: “Far different would be the effect of the decision of an international Court, in which, though it might run directly…”
Editor's note · Context
Holland warns of the potential negative consequences of decisions made by an international court that contradict British practices.
Share
More from Thomas Erskine Holland
Either let its place be taken by some clear and simple statement of unquestioned prize law, for the use of commanders and Officials, ... or established principles take care of themselves, certain doubtful points only being dealt with from…
To put an end to this confusion, I venture to suggest that, in concert with our Allies, the Declaration should be finally consigned to oblivion.
The Declaration of London has, most fortunately, never been ratified by the Government of Great Britain.
Already in the first weeks of the war England had renounced the Declaration of London, the contents of which her own delegates had recognised as binding in international law.





