According to the latter, it is inviolable, subject only to certain well-defined exceptions, among which reasonable requisitions of supplies would be recognised, while demands of money contributions, as such, would not be recognised.
Thomas Erskine Holland: “According to the latter, it is inviolable, subject only to certain well-defined exceptions, among which reasonable…”
Editor's note · Context
Holland outlines the modern view of private property in warfare, emphasizing its inviolability with specific exceptions.
Share
More from Thomas Erskine Holland
Its admirers have, however, too long preserved it, perhaps sub spe rati, in a state of suspended animation, using it by way of, as they supposed, a convenient handbook of maritime law for the purposes of the present war, though subject to…
I would submit that such a Report as that which accompanies the Declaration of London has no claim to the sort of interpretative authority which has been attributed to it; nor is it desirable that the requisite steps should be taken for…
This power has been so freely exercised, and large portions of the Declaration, not thereby affected, have proved to be so inapplicable to modern conditions, as disclosed by the war, that the document, so far from providing reliable…
The Declaration of London has, most fortunately, never been ratified by the Government of Great Britain.





