I would simply point out to the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Minge], who is a very valued member of the House Committee on Agriculture, that had the President not really vetoed the balanced budget, we would have a farm bill months ago. I understand that there are some concerns about structure of the farm bill. But in terms of the timeliness, and we all know it is time-sensitive, that that has been a problem. To my good friend from Texas, I understand the concern in regard to oil seeds. That is one of the few diversified crops that we have on the Great Plains. It is a burgeoning crop. It is one we want to move toward. In the Senate bill there is $132 million dedicated to that purpose, but there is a cap on that loan to prevent any further budget hemorrhaging. Perhaps when this bill goes to the Senate, we can accommodate that in some respect. Let me say again that I think everybody on the committee, if not everybody in the Congress, is supportive of the very valuable rural development programs that have been described, and the chairman, the former chairman of the committee, the gentleman from Texas [Mr. de la Garza], has been a champion in this respect, as has the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Stenholm] and the gentlewoman from North Carolina [Mrs. Clayton], who has just done an outstanding job in that regard in the past. But this is $3.5 billion, again.…
Liz Saville Roberts: “I would simply point out to the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Minge], who is a very valued member of the House Committee…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the President's veto on the farm bill during House debate.
Share
More from Liz Saville Roberts
I say to the Senator, you brought something up that I think is very important. As you look at the various countries that form up EADS and Airbus and that will participate in this joint effort, which is subsidized, even though we have a WTO…
That is an extraordinary argument, and I'm sure the Welsh government will share my amazement
Yes, I do. We have had before us--and more to come, I think--well-thought-out alternatives to meet the commonsense test. As I said before, we have had amendments to strip out billions in spending in the bill that will not stimulate the…
this amendment threatens to undermine and kill the Crop Insurance Program so vital to farmers and ranchers. The amendment does not take into account the real world expenses of industry, including the list of the private reinsurers which…





