Where the avoidance of sympathy is difficult is in his insistence that no Church can live without an assembly to debate its problems, and that no assembly can be real which is subject to external control.
Laski emphasizes the necessity of independent assemblies for churches to effectively address their issues.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
Nor do I see why it is unconstitutional for Labour, as in 1926, to withdraw from work in an orderly and coherent way.
He showed that government by discussion can be made to illuminate great principles.
Every religious body really means by blasphemy an attack upon its fundamental principles.
That some sort of toleration was inevitable few, save a group of prejudiced irreconcilables, would have denied.
Other voices in this conversation
