Harold J. Laski: “And does not that admission involve an unlimited freedom of expression…”

On the record

And does not that admission involve an unlimited freedom of expression in the interpretation of facts?

Said by

Harold J. Laski

Source

Laski argues that recognizing multiple interpretations is essential for freedom of expression.

More from Harold J. Laski

If he stands alone, he has neither the knowledge nor the power to secure for himself proper protection.

I can see no justice in such a denial of freedom.

The more equality there is in a State, the more use, in general, we can make of our freedom.

How could it seek security where it defied the desires of the vast majority of its subjects?

Other voices in this conversation

Harold J. Laski: “And does not that admission involve an unlimited freedom of expression in the interpretation of facts?”