All this, I think, is true; but it does not for a moment imply that a Bill of Rights is an automatic guarantee of liberty.
Harold J. Laski: “All this, I think, is true; but it does not for a moment imply that a Bill of Rights is an automatic guarantee of…”
On the record
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Laski acknowledges that while Bills of Rights are important, they do not automatically guarantee liberty.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
Each age finds that the incidence of freedom is significant at some special point, and there, once more, the lesson of freedom has to be learned.
The essence of the persecuting position is always that the persecutor has hold of truth and that he would betray its service by allowing it to be questioned.
To deny novelty or grievance a right of expression is a certain, if, indeed, an ultimate, validation of the truth they contain.
The only way to deal with novelty is to understand it, and the only way to deal with grievance is to seek a remedy for the complaint it embodies.





