I accept, therefore, the traditional notion that the separation of the judicial from the executive power, the right of the former to determine the legality of executive decision, is the basis of freedom.
Laski supports the separation of powers as essential for maintaining freedom.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
The case for the view that freedom of thought and speech is a good in itself is fairly easy to make.
That some sort of toleration was inevitable few, save a group of prejudiced irreconcilables, would have denied.
Nor do I see why it is unconstitutional for Labour, as in 1926, to withdraw from work in an orderly and coherent way.
But if the Church is not a supernatural institution, what is its nature?
Other voices in this conversation
