On the record
A nation, that is, is not entitled to be the sole judge of its conduct where that conduct, by its subject-matter, implicates others.
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgA nation, that is, is not entitled to be the sole judge of its conduct where that conduct, by its subject-matter, implicates others.
Laski argues that nations cannot unilaterally judge their actions when those actions affect others.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
That some sort of toleration was inevitable few, save a group of prejudiced irreconcilables, would have denied.
Nor do I see why it is unconstitutional for Labour, as in 1926, to withdraw from work in an orderly and coherent way.
If he stands alone, he has neither the knowledge nor the power to secure for himself proper protection.
Yet that does not render useless, even for our own day, the kind of work Locke did.