On the record
I conclude that its recognition as a state, if sovereignty be involved in that recognition, is incompatible with a just system of international relations.
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgHarold J. Laski: “I conclude that its recognition as a state, if sovereignty be involved in that recognition, is incompatible with a just…”
Editor's note · Context
Laski posits that recognition of a state must align with just international relations.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
The case for the view that freedom of thought and speech is a good in itself is fairly easy to make.
The charge that he supported the Revolution in America and deserted it in France is without meaning; for in the one there is no word that can honorably be twisted to support the other.
The State has power only for the protection of natural law.
If no such news is at hand it will be manufactured.
Other voices in this conversation
