It is, further, incompatible with the notion of an international law regarded as binding upon the member-states of the international community.
Harold J. Laski: “It is, further, incompatible with the notion of an international law regarded as binding upon the member-states of the…”
On the record
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Laski argues that state sovereignty is incompatible with binding international law.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
It has been the historic character of persecution always to degrade the persecutor and to strengthen the persecuted by drawing attention to their claims.
Each age finds that the incidence of freedom is significant at some special point, and there, once more, the lesson of freedom has to be learned.
The only way to deal with novelty is to understand it, and the only way to deal with grievance is to seek a remedy for the complaint it embodies.
Ultimately, that denial is always made upon the same ground: it is insisted that the doctrines or practices attacked are subversive of the civil order.





