He would not, as in the great speech at Bristol (1774), accept the doctrine that a member of Parliament was a mere delegate of his constituents rather than a representative of his own convictions.
Laski defends the idea that a Member of Parliament should represent their own convictions rather than just their constituents' wishes.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
He realized that freedom is born of a certain spontaneity for which the rigid lines of doctrinaire thinkers left no room.
We do not build Utopias; and the attempt to discover the eternal principles of political right invites disaster at the outset.
There are realms of conduct within which, to be free, I must be permitted to act as I please; to be denied self-expression there, is to be denied freedom.
But we cannot understand the eighteenth century, or its theories, unless we realize that its temper was still dominantly aristocratic.
Other voices in this conversation
