I am quite certain that, from the angle of individual freedom, the less interference the state attempts, the better for everyone concerned; but, equally, I am clear that to some interference the state is fully entitled.
Laski believes that minimal state interference is generally better for individual freedom, but acknowledges some necessary interference.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
The case for the view that freedom of thought and speech is a good in itself is fairly easy to make.
Nor do I see why it is unconstitutional for Labour, as in 1926, to withdraw from work in an orderly and coherent way.
Yet such defects must not blind us to the general rightness of their insight.
What is needed is a patriot king who will destroy corruption and awaken the spirit of liberty.
Other voices in this conversation
