It means that their wants do not define the ends of production, their standards do not set the objects of consideration, their right to determine the equilibrium of social forces is no longer recognized.
Laski argues that the desires of the poor are often ignored in societal production.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
Nor do I see why it is unconstitutional for Labour, as in 1926, to withdraw from work in an orderly and coherent way.
The case for the view that freedom of thought and speech is a good in itself is fairly easy to make.
He showed that government by discussion can be made to illuminate great principles.
I cannot accept the position that government is always entitled to count on industrial peace, whatever its policy.
Other voices in this conversation
