If a statesman not in office, Mr Roosevelt, for example, thinks the diplomatic policy of the executive likely to be attended by fatal results, must he confine himself to private representations, lest public utterance hinder the national unity?
Harold J. Laski: “If a statesman not in office, Mr Roosevelt, for example, thinks the diplomatic policy of the executive likely to be…”
On the record
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Laski questions whether public figures should voice concerns about government policies during wartime.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
Each age finds that the incidence of freedom is significant at some special point, and there, once more, the lesson of freedom has to be learned.
The essence of the persecuting position is always that the persecutor has hold of truth and that he would betray its service by allowing it to be questioned.
The only way to deal with novelty is to understand it, and the only way to deal with grievance is to seek a remedy for the complaint it embodies.
To deny novelty or grievance a right of expression is a certain, if, indeed, an ultimate, validation of the truth they contain.





