We need not argue that our happiness depends upon the possession of political power; we can argue that exclusion from it is likely to mean exclusion from that which largely determines the contours of happiness.
Laski suggests that political power is crucial for happiness, and exclusion from it can lead to unhappiness.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
Yet such defects must not blind us to the general rightness of their insight.
Nor do I see why it is unconstitutional for Labour, as in 1926, to withdraw from work in an orderly and coherent way.
Yet that does not render useless, even for our own day, the kind of work Locke did.
If he stands alone, he has neither the knowledge nor the power to secure for himself proper protection.
Other voices in this conversation
