We need not argue that our happiness depends upon the possession of political power; we can argue that exclusion from it is likely to mean exclusion from that which largely determines the contours of happiness.
Harold J. Laski: “We need not argue that our happiness depends upon the possession of political power; we can argue that exclusion from it…”
On the record
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Laski suggests that political power is crucial for happiness, and exclusion from it can lead to unhappiness.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
When attacks on liberty are political or economic, it is their motive rather than their nature that changes.
Ultimately, that denial is always made upon the same ground: it is insisted that the doctrines or practices attacked are subversive of the civil order.
He is able, accordingly, to indulge in the twofold luxury not only of preserving his own authority, but also of assisting the persons attacked to enter, if they so choose, the way of truth.
The only way to deal with novelty is to understand it, and the only way to deal with grievance is to seek a remedy for the complaint it embodies.





