Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 12, 2003
If the Senator would agree that all of those distinguished men and women with no prior judicial experience went on to become distinguished members of the U.S. Supreme Court, then can the Senator help us understand why the Members of the other side suddenly think it is not just important but disqualifying for someone who is nominated for a lower court to have no judicial experience? Why is this suddenly a new criterion when many of the most distinguished jurists in our country's history have had a diverse background of experience? Why is this suddenly a new standard for Miguel Estrada?
Said by
Douglas Alexander
Labour Party

Editor's note · Context

Questioning the criteria for judicial nominations during a Senate debate.

Share

More from Douglas Alexander

Jun 18, 2008

So, Mr. President, given the extraordinary impact of $4-a-gallon gasoline on the people of Tennessee and the people of this country, they are looking to us in the Senate and the Congress to do something about this. I noticed there are some…

govinfo.gov
Jul 15, 2026

I've always believed to be pro-Scottish, you don't need to be anti-English. We should be bigger and more generous than that.

thenational.scot
Jul 16, 2026

This multi-million-pound investment will strengthen UK energy and naval operations’ resilience at a time when the security challenges we face have never been greater.

thenational.scot
Feb 28, 2025

the bravest political leader in Europe since Winston Churchill

bbc.com

Other voices in this conversation