The splitting of sovereignty into many parts amounts to there being no sovereign.
Walter Bagehot: “The splitting of sovereignty into many parts amounts to there being no sovereign.”
Editor's note · Context
Bagehot argues that dividing sovereignty leads to a lack of a clear sovereign authority, complicating governance.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
Subject to this saving remark, however, I not only admit, but maintain, that our Constitution is full of curious oddities, which are impeding and mischievous, and ought to be struck out.
Our law very often reminds one of those outskirts of cities where you cannot for a long time tell how the streets come to wind about in so capricious and serpent-like a manner.
I own that I do not entirely sympathise with the horror of these anomalies which haunts some of our best critics.
I cannot, therefore, join in the full cry against anomalies; in my judgment it may quickly overrun the scent, and so miss what we should be glad to find.





