But, after all, national character is but a name for a collection of habits more or less universal.
Walter Bagehot: “But, after all, national character is but a name for a collection of habits more or less universal.”
Editor's note · Context
Bagehot defines national character as a collection of widely shared habits.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
These anomalies, in a hundred instances, mark the old boundaries of a constitutional struggle.
Political philosophy is still more imperfect; it has been framed from observations taken upon regular specimens of politics and States; as to these its teaching is most valuable.
The casual line was traced according to the strength of deceased combatants; succeeding generations fought elsewhere; and the hesitating line of a half-drawn battle was left to stand for a perpetual limit.
Our law very often reminds one of those outskirts of cities where you cannot for a long time tell how the streets come to wind about in so capricious and serpent-like a manner.





