Metaphors from law and metaphors from war make most of our current moral phrases, and a nice examination would easily explain that both rather vitiate what both often illustrate.
Walter Bagehot: “Metaphors from law and metaphors from war make most of our current moral phrases, and a nice examination would easily…”
Editor's note · Context
Bagehot critiques the use of metaphors from law and war in shaping moral language, suggesting they can distort meaning.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
If the above reasoning be sound, compulsory constituencies are necessary, voluntary constituencies destructive; the optional transferability of votes is not a salutary aid, but a ruinous innovation.
If those persons be people of different temperaments, different ideas, and different educations, you have an almost infallible security that nothing, or almost nothing, will be done with excessive rapidity.
And, to the effectual maintenance of such a separation, the exclusion of the President's Ministers from the legislature is essential.
He had seen that LEISURE is the great need of early societies, and slaves only can give men leisure.





