On the record
Up to the latest period the sovereign was supposed, to a most mischievous extent, to interfere in the choice of the persons to be Ministers.
Said by
Walter Bagehot
Source
gutenberg.orgUp to the latest period the sovereign was supposed, to a most mischievous extent, to interfere in the choice of the persons to be Ministers.
Bagehot critiques the extent of royal influence over ministerial appointments, which persisted for a long time.
Share
More from Walter Bagehot
The United States could not have become monarchical, even if the Constitutional Convention had decreed it, even if the component States had ratified it.
Thirdly, we see why so few nations have made rapid advance, and how many have become stationary.
But the Jewish advantage never did so; beginning in religion, contrary to a thousand analogies, it remained religious.
The nation then selected the English policy, but the Crown chose the English Ministers.