The need for pressure of any kind is, of course, regrettable, the only question being whether such limited pressure be not more humane to the nation which experiences it, and less distasteful to the nation which exercises it, than is the letting loose of the limitless calamities of war.
Thomas Erskine Holland: “The need for pressure of any kind is, of course, regrettable, the only question being whether such limited pressure be…”
Editor's note · Context
Holland reflects on the regrettable necessity of pressure in international relations compared to the calamities of war.
Share
More from Thomas Erskine Holland
Laws of war are consequently more than ever important and necessary, since, in the differences of culture and opinion which prevail between individuals and classes, law is almost the only moral power the force of which is acknowledged by…
Since compulsory service has turned standing armies into national armies, war has also become national.
If in our own day a law recognised by the civilised world forbids, in a general way, the soldier to make booty in warfare on land, we have here a great advance in civilisation, and the jurists have had their share in bringing it about.
No, you must attack all the resources of the enemy's Government: its finances, its railways, its stores, and even its prestige.





