Balfour, that the sharp distinction between combatants and non-combatants contemplated by the ordinary laws of war is inapplicable (without the exercise of undue severity) to operations such as those now being carried out in South Africa.
Thomas Erskine Holland: “Balfour, that the sharp distinction between combatants and non-combatants contemplated by the ordinary laws of war is…”
Editor's note · Context
Holland highlights the complexities of distinguishing between combatants and non-combatants in modern warfare, particularly in South Africa.
Share
More from Thomas Erskine Holland
They testify to, and may promote, a very widely spread entente cordiale, they enhance the prestige of the tribunal of The Hague, and they assure the reference to that tribunal of certain classes of questions which might otherwise give rise…
We see a general legal persuasion ever in process of more and more distinct formation uniting all civilised peoples.
The greatest kindness in war is to bring it to a speedy conclusion.
The need for pressure of any kind is, of course, regrettable, the only question being whether such limited pressure be not more humane to the nation which experiences it, and less distasteful to the nation which exercises it, than is the…





