The cutting, elsewhere than in the enemy's waters, of a cable connecting enemy with neutral territory receives no countenance from international law.
Thomas Erskine Holland: “The cutting, elsewhere than in the enemy's waters, of a cable connecting enemy with neutral territory receives no…”
Editor's note · Context
Holland asserts that international law does not support cutting cables outside enemy waters.
Share
More from Thomas Erskine Holland
Never will an article learnt by rote persuade soldiers to see a regular enemy (sections 2-4) in the unorganised population which takes up arms 'spontaneously' (so of its own motion) and puts them in danger of their life at every moment of…
Without war the world would stagnate, and lose itself in materialism.
To localise hostile pressure as far as possible, and to give to it such a character as shall restrict its incidence to the peccant State, is surely in the interest of the general good.
Pacific reprisals should also, according to the tendency of modern opinion and practice, be so applied as not to interfere with the interests of third Powers and their subjects.





