OK. Again, let me say to the gentleman that we all stand in admiration of the gentleman's efforts to cut spending. Nobody has done more in the Congress. But what I would like to try to point out is that we do have two separate pastures in regard to our financial obligation in regard to agriculture. One is the mandatory pasture, and one is the discretionary pasture. The gentleman has done yeoman work in regards to the discretionary part of the funding. We are in charge of the mandatory part. Now, we started out at $56.6 billion.
Liz Saville Roberts: “OK. Again, let me say to the gentleman that we all stand in admiration of the gentleman's efforts to cut spending.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing financial obligations in agriculture funding during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Liz Saville Roberts
Well, as I said before, some of our critics--and we should have critics. We should have oversight. We are not doing everything right, that is for sure. And farm bills--I tell you, we passed the Rubicon. This is no longer a farm bill. This…
this amendment threatens to undermine and kill the Crop Insurance Program so vital to farmers and ranchers. The amendment does not take into account the real world expenses of industry, including the list of the private reinsurers which…
It is my hope it will be considered hot-lined on both sides and passed later this afternoon. This resolution is a commendation resolution on behalf of the University of Kansas Men's Basketball Team for winning the 2008 National Collegiate…
It makes no sense. Also, it`s just a big F-U to black citizens in Mississippi who are dying at disproportionate rates.





