I strongly oppose that effort. This seems manifestly a very wrong approach to what may be a very real problem. The alternative offered in this proposal of having the Nation's most esteemed jurists turn to the lecture circuit to supplement their salary, I believe, is simply unacceptable. The cost, it seems to me, would be too high. It would be measured in the further loss of confidence in the integrity of this Government's officials. Congress took an important step in trying to restore public confidence in the institutions of Government when it enacted the honoraria ban as part of the ethics reform package way back in 1989. We should not backtrack on that effort. If our Federal Judges and Justices need a pay raise, then by all means let's provide for one, but let's not retreat to the discredited practices of the past.
Liz Saville Roberts: “I strongly oppose that effort. This seems manifestly a very wrong approach to what may be a very real problem. The…”
On the recordSeptember 21, 2000
Said by
Liz Saville Roberts
Plaid Cymru
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a proposal to remove honoraria restrictions for Federal Judges and Justices.
Share
More from Liz Saville Roberts
Feb 5, 2009
let me ask my distinguished friend and colleague from Oklahoma this. We all know we have to address the problems we face in our economy. It is becoming a crisis. The majority leader said that, the minority leader said that, and everybody…
Feb 5, 2009
Yes, I do. We have had before us--and more to come, I think--well-thought-out alternatives to meet the commonsense test. As I said before, we have had amendments to strip out billions in spending in the bill that will not stimulate the…
Mar 2, 2021
It makes no sense. Also, it`s just a big F-U to black citizens in Mississippi who are dying at disproportionate rates.





