We are less concerned here with the specific economic details of the Wealth of Nations than with its general attitude to the State.
Harold J. Laski: “We are less concerned here with the specific economic details of the Wealth of Nations than with its general attitude to…”
Editor's note · Context
Laski emphasizes the importance of understanding the broader implications of Adam Smith's work rather than just its economic specifics.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
We grant it in religion to deny it in politics; we grant it in politics, to deny it in economic matters.
When attacks on liberty are political or economic, it is their motive rather than their nature that changes.
The intolerance may be Catholic, when it insists that a unity of outlook is essential for the preservation of society; or it may be Protestant when, as with Calvin and the Socinians, it holds that the blasphemous nature of the belief…
Ultimately, that denial is always made upon the same ground: it is insisted that the doctrines or practices attacked are subversive of the civil order.





