Almost always freedom of speech results in a mitigation which renders disorder unnecessary; almost always, also, prohibition of that freedom merely makes the agitation more dangerous because it drives it underground.
Laski argues that freedom of speech can prevent disorder, while its suppression often exacerbates tensions.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
If he stands alone, he has neither the knowledge nor the power to secure for himself proper protection.
I cannot accept the position that government is always entitled to count on industrial peace, whatever its policy.
Even Lincoln supported his generals in completely indefensible attacks on civilian rights.
The State has power only for the protection of natural law.
Other voices in this conversation
