Centralized government in local matters may be more efficient than a decentralized system; but that superior efficiency will never, as Mill long ago pointed out, compensate for an inferior interest in the result.
Harold J. Laski: “Centralized government in local matters may be more efficient than a decentralized system; but that superior efficiency…”
On the record
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Laski acknowledges the efficiency of centralized government but warns against its disconnection from local interests.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
The essence of the persecuting position is always that the persecutor has hold of truth and that he would betray its service by allowing it to be questioned.
We grant it in religion to deny it in politics; we grant it in politics, to deny it in economic matters.
To deny novelty or grievance a right of expression is a certain, if, indeed, an ultimate, validation of the truth they contain.
He is able, accordingly, to indulge in the twofold luxury not only of preserving his own authority, but also of assisting the persons attacked to enter, if they so choose, the way of truth.





