On the record
What his whole work amounts to in substance--it is a significant anticipation of Rousseau--is a denial that sovereignty can exist anywhere save in the community as a whole.
Said by
Harold J. Laski
Source
gutenberg.orgHarold J. Laski: “What his whole work amounts to in substance--it is a significant anticipation of Rousseau--is a denial that sovereignty…”
Editor's note · Context
Laski interprets Locke's work as a precursor to Rousseau's ideas on sovereignty residing in the community.
Share
More from Harold J. Laski
There is no danger that the general strike will ever be other than a weapon of last resort; the occasions when it can be successfully used will be of the utmost rarity.
But we cannot understand the eighteenth century, or its theories, unless we realize that its temper was still dominantly aristocratic.
The theorist of the Revolution is Locke; and it was his conscious effort to justify the innovations of 1688.
Even Lincoln supported his generals in completely indefensible attacks on civilian rights.
Other voices in this conversation
